UKDK
2009 has been a watershed year in British politics. Recently, the Iraq war enquiry has revealed the sheer dishonesty of Labour’s rationale for joining the US invasion. This has united many in condemnation.
But more importantly, we have seen the true nature of the British ruling class; not only their willingness to sacrifice the national interest, and the interests of the English in particular, but also their outright financial dishonesty. It is little wonder that Britain continues to decline when we are governed by a bunch of crooks. The scale and depth of the sleaze has proved bewildering. From petty claims for household items, the flipping, to the flase claims for mortgage payments, our MPs have demonstrated their contempt for probity, their greed, and their unfitness to govern.
This sleaze does not only affect the House of Commons, but also the House of Lords. This chamber, which Labour pledged to reform, has simply been swamped with Tony’s cronies who have turned that once respected body into being another bunch of self-serving crooked politicians.
On the political front, all the major parties have dishonoured their election pledges to hold a referendum on the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty. All of them are happy to hand over our sovereignty and freedoms to EU tyranny. Labour have given incredible sums of taxpayers’ monies to a bunch of arrogant, greedy bankers who in turn have used it to maintain if not increase their bonuses without a moment’s hesitation or any contrition. The country has been virtually bankrupted by this. Meanwhile, the new preening Supreme Court has conferred legal immunity on the bankers relating to their usury penalty charges.
Political correctness has continued to rampage and mass immigration has continued unrestrained, although it has now been revealed that Labour always intended to promote mass immigration, not for the supposed economic reasons, but with the intention of multiculturalizing England. Colonization has always been a way that a ruling class has sought to subjugate an unwilling people, and it is no different now in England than anywhere else before. This is vote rigging at its most dangerous and repugnant. To sacrifice the interests of the ordinary English people, and to deliberately push them out of their jobs and replace them with immigrants, is completely immoral.
Despite the depravity of the government executive, there is no check on it. In the Czech Republic, the president, despite having few powers, did avoid signing the Lisbon Treaty for quite some time and extracted new concessions too. Britain was in the ridiculous position of having to hope that the Czech president could hold out long enough for a general election in Britain to bring in a new government which might hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. It was not to be. But what of the British head of state? The Queen had happily signed the treaty already and the House of Lords was uninterested in holding Labour to its manifesto commitments even in so far as it was able to.
Even when the sleaze allegations were at their worst, there was no question of parliament being dissolved and a general election being called - which is what should have happened. The Queen had no compunction or will to insist on probity among our politicians, and their lordships were too busy with their own snouts in the trough to object.
That we are now holding another gentlemanly enquiry into the Iraq war demonstrates the difference between Britain and the USA, where heads did quickly roll after the failure to locate the alleged weapons of mass destruction. This all highlights the inadequacy of the British constitution. Instead of throwing out these crooked politicians, with all the pomposity that the British establishment can muster, we had to sit and watch the ridiculous spectacle of the Queen, in all her finery, deliver the speech for the next parliamentary session surrounded by crooks who are the product of a rigged election, to which she did not object, and who intend to rig the oncoming election as best they can in the same manner [eg see the English Rights Campaign items dated 13 March 2006 and 15 October 2005].
In the looming general election the people have the opportunity to sweep these crooks out of office. We, the ordinary people, must not hesitate to do so. We need a new constitution to ensure a democratic renewal and to address the inadequacies of the present one. It is out country and we need to take it back.
But more importantly, we have seen the true nature of the British ruling class; not only their willingness to sacrifice the national interest, and the interests of the English in particular, but also their outright financial dishonesty. It is little wonder that Britain continues to decline when we are governed by a bunch of crooks. The scale and depth of the sleaze has proved bewildering. From petty claims for household items, the flipping, to the flase claims for mortgage payments, our MPs have demonstrated their contempt for probity, their greed, and their unfitness to govern.
This sleaze does not only affect the House of Commons, but also the House of Lords. This chamber, which Labour pledged to reform, has simply been swamped with Tony’s cronies who have turned that once respected body into being another bunch of self-serving crooked politicians.
On the political front, all the major parties have dishonoured their election pledges to hold a referendum on the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty. All of them are happy to hand over our sovereignty and freedoms to EU tyranny. Labour have given incredible sums of taxpayers’ monies to a bunch of arrogant, greedy bankers who in turn have used it to maintain if not increase their bonuses without a moment’s hesitation or any contrition. The country has been virtually bankrupted by this. Meanwhile, the new preening Supreme Court has conferred legal immunity on the bankers relating to their usury penalty charges.
Political correctness has continued to rampage and mass immigration has continued unrestrained, although it has now been revealed that Labour always intended to promote mass immigration, not for the supposed economic reasons, but with the intention of multiculturalizing England. Colonization has always been a way that a ruling class has sought to subjugate an unwilling people, and it is no different now in England than anywhere else before. This is vote rigging at its most dangerous and repugnant. To sacrifice the interests of the ordinary English people, and to deliberately push them out of their jobs and replace them with immigrants, is completely immoral.
Despite the depravity of the government executive, there is no check on it. In the Czech Republic, the president, despite having few powers, did avoid signing the Lisbon Treaty for quite some time and extracted new concessions too. Britain was in the ridiculous position of having to hope that the Czech president could hold out long enough for a general election in Britain to bring in a new government which might hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. It was not to be. But what of the British head of state? The Queen had happily signed the treaty already and the House of Lords was uninterested in holding Labour to its manifesto commitments even in so far as it was able to.
Even when the sleaze allegations were at their worst, there was no question of parliament being dissolved and a general election being called - which is what should have happened. The Queen had no compunction or will to insist on probity among our politicians, and their lordships were too busy with their own snouts in the trough to object.
That we are now holding another gentlemanly enquiry into the Iraq war demonstrates the difference between Britain and the USA, where heads did quickly roll after the failure to locate the alleged weapons of mass destruction. This all highlights the inadequacy of the British constitution. Instead of throwing out these crooked politicians, with all the pomposity that the British establishment can muster, we had to sit and watch the ridiculous spectacle of the Queen, in all her finery, deliver the speech for the next parliamentary session surrounded by crooks who are the product of a rigged election, to which she did not object, and who intend to rig the oncoming election as best they can in the same manner [eg see the English Rights Campaign items dated 13 March 2006 and 15 October 2005].
In the looming general election the people have the opportunity to sweep these crooks out of office. We, the ordinary people, must not hesitate to do so. We need a new constitution to ensure a democratic renewal and to address the inadequacies of the present one. It is out country and we need to take it back.