English Rights Campaign

to defend the rights and interests of the English nation

Saturday, September 24, 2005

THE BRITISH INQUISITION

Below is an extract from the recent speech given by Trevor Phillips in Manchester.

Equality

At the core of our equality work lies our enforcement of the Race Relations Act. We are this year spending over a million and a half pounds on support of meritorious legal cases brought either to the CRE or to our local grassroots partners. We intend to continue that support.

There has been some suggestion that the CRE has, in recent times, been less than vigorous in its enforcement work. This is particularly surprising since we have just seen a record award in an employment tribunal in a case of race discrimination – an award of £1.6m. It is surprising given that the CRE is spending well over a million pounds on grassroots legal support, in addition to handling several hundred cases directly. This year we expect to win in excess of a million pounds in settlements of cases handled by CRE staff; this will be multiplied several times by our partners in grassroots law firms, RECs, trades unions and CABx.

We have begun and concluded nearly 300 enforcement actions against public authorities in the past 18 months; we started and completed the largest ever formal investigation – into the police – in the Commission’s history; and we have just expanded our enforcement team after many years of its being starved of resources.
It may be that in the past, people got used to the CRE talking a lot and doing little. We now prefer it the other way around.

But we intend to go further. We will step up our efforts to work with government and public authorities to enforce the race equality duty. A vital weapon in this work is our race equality impact assessment. We will expect public authorities, including government departments, to conduct serious impact assessments on anti-terror laws, or whether, for example, the move of jobs from London will have a disproportionate and adverse impact on ethnic minorities.

If the answer is yes, we expect the policy to change. And let me be clear, if it does not change, we will seek redress in the courts.

But in our equality work we won’t ignore the fact that racial inequality and disadvantage strikes all kinds of people. Our investigation into the treatment of Gypsies and Travellers is all about people who are white; and the work we are doing on the educational achievement of boys may pay as rich dividends for white boys as I hope it will for black boys.

We will also be seeking new approaches to tackling institutional racism in both the public and private sectors: equality audits, new powers for company directors to demand information about equality performance of potential partners, and new incentives for shareholders to hold their boards to account on equality issues.’


The extract comes about 80% of the way into the speech. Presumably, Mr Phillips believed that by dealing with his plans for a more aggressive prosecution of the British Inquisition this late into his speech, and after a lot of flowery language, that by then people would be slumbering and not notice/understand what he is saying.

Given by the widespread response, if that was his calculation then he was right.

Mr Phillips is openly boasting of the number of prosecutions he is hoping to bring, boasting of the expansion of the ‘enforcement team after many years of its being starved of resources’, and boasting of the manner in which the CRE is pushing public authorities around. He even threatens to prosecute the government if it does not do as he says!

This is an unelected quangocrat talking.

Even the private sector can expect the CRE to tell it what it can and cannot do and faces the extra red tape of so-called ‘race equality impact assessment’, the enforcement of a ‘race equality duty’, the demand for information of ‘equality performance of potential partners’, ‘equality audits’, ‘and new incentives for shareholders to hold their boards to account on equality issues’.

To Mr Phillips, equality means race quotas. This is all about the enforcement of race quotas. Be there no mistake, no matter how much he may seek to deny it, that is what he is advocating. And as the ethnic minorities increase as proportion of the population [the proportion is doubling every 20 years], then so will the size of the race quotas. This will eventually result in the English becoming a persecuted racial minority in their own country. Mr Phillips is advocating racial engineering and the ethnic cleansing of the English in England.

It is a thoroughly evil policy.

Nor should it be forgotten that this is the man, an unreconstructed communist, who has been chairman of the CRE in the period following 9/11 and in the run up to 7/7. His tenure of the CRE has been a disaster for the country.

Both Mr Phillips and CRE should be consigned to the dustbin of history. The CRE should be immediately closed down.

Mr Phillips’s speech has even won support from the Tory party - needless to say. They have not even objected to Mr Phillips’s concept of equality, which is simply the persecution of the English and the abolition of a free society.

That is why the English can no longer rely on the old decadent establishment parties. We need our own nationalist party - the English Democrats Party - to represent our own interests.

[There will be a more complete response to Mr Phillips’s speech shortly.]