ETHNIC CLEANSING
Labour has announced that they intend to change the law in order to encourage anti-English discrimination. In future companies will be allowed to discriminate in favour of black and women candidates and against Englishmen.
Harriet Harman has said that ‘positive action’ is necessary to ensure that the workforce proportionally represents the population as a whole.
The proposals are supported by the TUC, the so-called Equalities and Human Rights Commission, and the CBI. That the establishment toadies at the CBI support such pernicious measures should come as no surprise. It is an organization which is usually in support of misguided government policies - such as the ERM, the single currency and the EU - but this time they have excelled themselves by being a party to the promotion of race zealotry.
Labour also said that they intend that more government contracts would be awarded to firms with a politically correct record on equality. Public organizations will be required not to discriminate on grounds of ‘sexual orientation, gender reassignment, age and religion or belief’. They will be required to report on pay inequalities and the Equality and Human Rights Commission will be carrying out a series of enquiries into pay.
This anti-English discrimination, in England, needs to be put into context. It was reported by the Office for National Statistics in the summer that the scale of immigration is such that in 2005 only 64% of babies born in England and Wales were recorded as being ‘White British’. Sir Andrew Green, the chairman of MigrationWatch, said:
If mass immigration continues, as the greater proportion of non-English children mature and enter the jobs market, then the anti-English discrimination will force out increasing numbers of Englishmen in pursuit of racial engineering. Labour is not only prepared to allow the continuance of mass immigration irrespective of the harm done to the fabric of our society, but are also prepared to displace the indigenous English population to that end.
Harriet Harman has said that ‘positive action’ is necessary to ensure that the workforce proportionally represents the population as a whole.
The proposals are supported by the TUC, the so-called Equalities and Human Rights Commission, and the CBI. That the establishment toadies at the CBI support such pernicious measures should come as no surprise. It is an organization which is usually in support of misguided government policies - such as the ERM, the single currency and the EU - but this time they have excelled themselves by being a party to the promotion of race zealotry.
Labour also said that they intend that more government contracts would be awarded to firms with a politically correct record on equality. Public organizations will be required not to discriminate on grounds of ‘sexual orientation, gender reassignment, age and religion or belief’. They will be required to report on pay inequalities and the Equality and Human Rights Commission will be carrying out a series of enquiries into pay.
This anti-English discrimination, in England, needs to be put into context. It was reported by the Office for National Statistics in the summer that the scale of immigration is such that in 2005 only 64% of babies born in England and Wales were recorded as being ‘White British’. Sir Andrew Green, the chairman of MigrationWatch, said:
‘This is a measure of the extent to which uncontrolled immigration is changing the nature of our society against the wishes of a very large majority. Immigration is now expected to account for 70% of our population increase in the next 25 years. This means we will have to build a city the size of Birmingham every three or four years to sustain the newcomers.’
If mass immigration continues, as the greater proportion of non-English children mature and enter the jobs market, then the anti-English discrimination will force out increasing numbers of Englishmen in pursuit of racial engineering. Labour is not only prepared to allow the continuance of mass immigration irrespective of the harm done to the fabric of our society, but are also prepared to displace the indigenous English population to that end.
<< Home