THE LOONY LEFT

At a time when some local neighbourhoods are being blighted and swamped by gypsies and other travellers, who routinely flout the planning laws, it is regrettable, although predictable, that some of the monies raised by comic relief are to be allocated to gipsies’ groups to help them with their ‘basic rights’. This is to include legal advice.

£100,000 has been granted.

Further to that comes the news that the new powers which have been granted to councils to combat the spread of illegal gypsy sites are almost totally ineffective. The new temporary stop notices are supposed to be used by councils to stop gypsies adding extra caravans to existing sites.

However, it has now been revealed that they cannot be used if the caravans are the gypsies' ‘main residences’. As caravans are gypsies’ main residences, the new powers are useless. This farce comes shortly after it was revealed that John Prescott’s department had ruled that gypsies’ human rights were to take priority over planning regulations.

So much for our green and pleasant land.

But this is not the first time that John Prescott has been celebrating diversity. His department has previously been caught out denying that the English even exist. The letter concerned is a gem and is reproduced below:

‘Thank you for your letter.

Mr Prescott has asked me to write to you regarding your claims of discrimination. After making enquiries I believe you are a citizen of the United Kingdom and have a native ethnicity.


I shall attempt to answer your comments. Firstly, I assume you are referring to the Census form that has no facility for stating English nationality. This is because there is no such nationality as English as laid down by various acts of Parliament and accession. Persons born in the United Kingdom are citizens of the United Kingdom and are therefore British/English.

Secondly, you state that your children are unable to practice their religion at school. Since 1989, all non-denominated schools in the United Kingdom have had the right to Christian assembly removed. This was because it was felt to be insensitive to the needs of ethnic minorities being forced to practice a creed different to their own. There is however, no reason you cannot attend church services of your own denomination in your own time.

Lastly, you are complaining that you cannot celebrate your patron saint’s day without punitive financial penalties being imposed. Again, there is no reason preventing you from celebrating in your own time as long as your celebrations are kept within legal restraints and do not interfere with the sensitivities of any ethnic minority.

I trust this answers your queries.

Yours sincerely

R Morrison

PP Rt Hon John Prescott’

This is the type of thinking that is produced when the working-class bruiser starts aping a middle-class trendy-lefty.

In fact the real reason for the restraints being imposed on English culture, is not the sensitivities of ethnic minorities at all. There has not been a clamour of protests emanating from various ethnic minority groups complaining about St George’s Day, or our Christian heritage and culture.

Those complaining about the English are the neo-communist politically correct and they do so for their own purposes. They are citing the alleged sensitivities of ethnic minorities partly to try and draw race into things and to further race war politics, and partly as they think that it makes them look good.

It is their aim to destroy English culture and any concept of the English as a nation.